Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets-Enhanced FMEA for COVID-19 Risk Assessment

Lazim Abdullah, Noor Azzah Awang, Muhammad Qiyas

Abstract


Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a widely used tool for risk analysis, primarily to identify risk factors affecting system quality. Due to the limitations of the traditional FMEA model, several recent models incorporating advanced fuzzy set extensions have been developed to enhance the reliability of risk assessment outcomes. However, most of these models limit expert flexibility in expressing preferences and often overlook the impact of unequal expert weights and the stability of risk ranking results. This study introduces a new FMEA model based on Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets (Q-ROFSs), termed Q-ROFSsFMEA. Q-ROFSs, an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, introduce a new linguistic term. The Q-ROFSsFMEA model considers the unequal weights of experts, enabling a dynamic representation of expert preferences. These weights and the linguistic evaluation of risk factors are integrated through an aggregation operator, facilitating consensus among experts. The model is applied to a case study on COVID-19 risk factors, revealing that ‘older age’ (risk priority number 0.000012) is the highest risk factor, while ‘gender’ (risk priority number -0.0037) is the lowest. It is found that the ranking of risk factors determined by the Q-ROFSs-FMEA model is obtained as FM1 > FM3 > FM4 > FM5 > FM6 > FM7 > FM8 > FM2. Furthermore, a comparative analysis indicates consistent ranking results across different models, demonstrating the reliability of the proposed model. The case study and comparative analysis validate the effectiveness and applicability of the Q-ROFSsbased risk assessment model.


Full Text:

PDF

References


V. Anes, L. Reis, E. Henriques, and A. Abreu, A risk assessment model for decision making in innovation projects, Doctoral Conference on Computing, Electrical and Industrial Systems, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 79-90.

M. Akbari, P. Khazaee, I. Sabetghadam, and P. Karimifard, Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for power transformers, 28th International Power System Conference (PSC), 2013, pp. 1-7.

M. L. Chiozza, and C. Ponzetti, FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors, Clinica chimica acta 404(1) (2009) 75-78.

N. G. Mutlu, and S. Altuntas, Risk analysis for occupational safety and health in the textile industry: Integration of FMEA, FTA, and BIFPET methods, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 72 (2019) 222-240.

K. M. Tay and C.P. Lim, On the use of fuzzy inference techniques in assessment models: part II: industrial applications, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 7(3) (2008) 283–302.

M. Rausand, and A. Hoyland, System reliability theory: models, statistical methods, and applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2003).

L. Ouyang, W. Zheng, Y. Zhu, and X. Zhou, An interval probability‐based FMEA model for risk assessment: A real‐world case, Quality and Reliability Engineering International 36(1) (2020) 125-143.

Z. Wu, W. Liu, and W. Nie, Literature review and prospect of the development and application of FMEA in manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 112(5) (2021) 1409-1436.

M. Yazdi, S. Daneshvar, and H. Setareh, An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Safety science 98 (2017) 113-123.

A.P. Subriadi, and N. F. Najwa, The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment, Heliyon 6(1) (2020) e03161.

H. C. Liu, J. X. You, C. Lu, and M. M. Shan, Application of interval 2-tuple linguistic MULTIMOORA method for health-care waste treatment technology evaluation and selection, Waste Management 34(11) (2014) 2355-2364.

D. Chalidyanto, and W. E. Kurniasari, Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) report of medication processing a private hospital. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 14(2) (2020) 3257-3261.

J. C. Lee, A. Daraba, C. Voidarou, G. Rozos, H. A. E. Enshasy, and T. Varzakas, Implementation of food safety management systems along with other management tools (HAZOP, FMEA, Ishikawa, Pareto). The case study of listeria monocytogenes and correlation with microbiological criteria, Foods 10(9) (2021) 2169.

F. Sharifi, M. A. Vahdatzad, B. Barghi, and N. Azadeh-Fard, Identifying and ranking risks using combined FMEA-TOPSIS method for new product development in the dairy industry and offering mitigation strategies: case study of Ramak Company, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 13 (2022) 2790–2807.

V. Başhan, H. Demirel, and M. Gul, An FMEA-based TOPSIS approach under single valued neutrosophic sets for maritime risk evaluation: the case of ship navigation safety, Soft Computing 24(24) (2020) 18749-18764.

M. Şenel, B. Şenel, and C. A. Havle, Risk analysis of ports in Maritime Industry in Turkey using FMEA based intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. In ITM Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 22, 2018, p. 01018.

H. C. Liu, L. Liu, and N. Liu, Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 40(2) (2013) 828-838.

J. Balaraju, M. G. Raj, and C. S. Murthy, Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine–A case study, Journal of Sustainable Mining 18(4) (2019) 257-268.

L. Wang, Y. P. Hu, H. C. Liu, and H. Shi, A linguistic risk prioritization approach for failure mode and effects analysis: A case study of medical product development. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 35(6) (2019) 1735-1752.

J. Huang, H. C. Liu, C. Y. Duan, and M. S. Song, An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method, Annals of Operations Research 312(1) (2022) 235-258.

Yalcinkaya, and S. Cebi, Using Fuzzy Set Based Model for Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Risks Assessment. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2022. (Springer, Cham, 2022) pp. 252-260.

G. Huang, L. Xiao, W. Pedrycz, G. Zhang, and L. Martinez, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using T-Spherical Fuzzy Maximizing Deviation and Combined Comparison Solution Methods. IEEE Transactions on Reliability (2022) 1-22.

R. X. Nie, Z. P. Tian, X. K. Wang, J. Q. Wang, and T. L. Wang, Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment. Knowledge-Based Systems 162 (2018) 185-201.

S. Daneshvar, M. Yazdi, and K. A. Adesina, Fuzzy smart failure modes and effects analysis to improve safety performance of system: Case study of an aircraft landing system. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 36(3) (2020) 890-909.

Q. Wang, Y. X. Cao, and H. Y. Zhang, Multi-criteria decision-making method based on distance measure and Choquet integral for linguistic Z-numbers. Cognitive Computation 9(6) (2017) 827-842.

Z. L. Wang, You, J. X., Liu, H. C., and Wu, S. M. Failure mode and effect analysis using soft set theory and COPRAS method. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 10(1) (2017) 1002-1015.

O. M. Testik, and E. T. Unlu, Fuzzy FMEA in risk assessment for test and calibration laboratories, Quality and Reliability Engineering International (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3198.

M. Bhuvanesh Kumar, and R. Parameshwaran, Fuzzy integrated QFD, FMEA framework for the selection of lean tools in a manufacturing organisation. Production Planning and Control 29(5) (2018) 403-417.

Ouyang, Zhu, Y., Zheng, W., and Yan, L. An information fusion FMEA method to assess the risk of healthcare waste. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(1) (2021) 111-124.

A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8(3) (1965) 338-353.

K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy set and systems 20 (1986) 87-96.

R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(5) (2017) 1222–1230.

A. Bhuiyan, H. Dinçer, S. Yüksel, A. Mikhaylov, M. S. S. Danish, G. Pinter, and D. Stepanova, Economic indicators and bioenergy supply in developed economies: QROF-DEMATEL and random forest models. Energy Reports 8 (2022) 561-570.

S. Singh, and A. H. Ganie, Some novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy correlation coefficients based on the statistical viewpoint with their applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 13(4) (2022) 2227-2252.

P. Liu, and P. Wang, Some q‐rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple‐attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 33(2) (2018) 259-280.

X. Peng, and Z. Luo, A review of q-rung orthopair fuzzy information: bibliometrics and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review 54(5) (2021) 3361-3430.

C. Jin, Y. Ran, and Zhang, G. Interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy FMEA application to improve risk evaluation process of tool changing manipulator. Applied Soft Computing 104 (2021) 107192.

J. Rashedi, B. Mahdavi Poor, V. Asgharzadeh, M. Pourostadi, H. Samadi Kafil, A. Vegari, and M. Asgharzadeh, Risk factors for COVID-19. Infez Med 28(4) (2020) 469-474.

R. E. Jordan, P. Adab, and K. Cheng, Covid-19: risk factors for severe disease and death. Bmj (2020) 368.

C. Gebhard, V. Regitz-Zagrosek, H. K. Neuhauser, R. Morgan, and S. L. Klein, Impact of sex and gender on COVID-19 outcomes in Europe. Biology of Sex Differences 11(1) (2020) 1-13.

E. Ambrosino, G. Barbagelata, T. Corbi, C. Ciarambino, A. Politi, and M. Moretti, Gender differences in treatment of Coronavirus Disease-2019. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease (2020) 90(4) 646-656.

E. de Sousa Lima, Barros, L. C. M., and Aragão, G. F. (2020). Could autism spectrum disorders be a risk factor for COVID-19?. Medical Hypotheses 144 109899.

V. Leso, L. Fontana, and I. Iavicoli, Susceptibility to coronavirus (COVID-19) in occupational settings: The complex interplay between individual and workplace factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(3) (2021) 1030.

E. Rod, O. Oviedo-Trespalacios, and J. Cortes-Ramirez, A brief-review of the risk factors for Covid-19 severity, Revista de saude publica 54 (2020) 1-11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v49i1.4791

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.