Enhanced CoCoSo Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy MAGDM and Application to Financial Risk Evaluation of High-Tech Enterprises
Abstract
The continuous innovation of science and technology is the foundation for the survival and development of high-tech enterprises. In order to gain a foothold in the fierce market competition, enterprises must seize market share by developing new high-tech products tailored to the market, and obtain economic benefits for maintaining survival and development. However, to ensure the smooth progress of the development and research process, sufficient financial support is required. Fundraising is particularly important, even if the required funds are raised, its own high-risk needs to be given special attention. The financial risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises is a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM). Recently, the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method has been employed to manage MAGDM issues. The intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) are used as a tool for portraying uncertain information during the financial risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises. In this paper, the intuitionistic fuzzyCoCoSo (IF-CoCoSo) method is cultivated to manage the MAGDM based on the Hamming distance and Euclid distance under IFSs. In the end, a numerical case study for financial risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises is supplied to validate the proposed method. The main contributions of this paper are outlined: (1) the CoCoSo method has been extended to IFSs; (2) Information Entropy is used to derive weight based on the Hamming distance and Euclid distanceunder IFSs.(3) the IF-CoCoSo method is founded to manage the MAGDM based on the Hamming distance and Euclid distance under IFSs; (4) a numerical case study for financial risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises and some comparative analysis is supplied to validate the proposed method.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Z. Wen, H.C. Liao, A. Emrouznejad, Information representation of blockchain technology: Risk evaluation of investment by personalized quantifier with cubic spline interpolation, Information Processing & Management, 58 (2021) 13.
M. Sharp, M. Dadfarnia, T. Sprock, D. Thomas, Procedural Guide for System-Level Impact Evaluation of Industrial Artificial Intelligence-Driven Technologies: Application to Risk-Based Investment Analysis for Condition Monitoring Systems in Manufacturing, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 144 (2022) 14.
T. To, M. Heleno, A. Valenzuela, Risk-constrained multi-period investment model for Distributed Energy Resources considering technology costs and regulatory uncertainties, Applied Energy, 319 (2022) 11.
E. Omri, N. Chtourou, D. Bazin, Risk management and policy implications for concentrating solar power technology investments in Tunisia, Journal of Environmental Management, 237 (2019) 504-518.
M. Zhou, S.W. Lu, Q. Wu, S. Jin, J. Yan, Z.X. Sang, R.C. Fang, Iop, Research on Risk Assessment Technology of Investment Plan Implementation of Electricity Grid Construction Projects Based on Automatically Generated Fixed Asset Investment, in: 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy Resources and Environment Engineering (ICAESEE), Iop Publishing Ltd, Chongqing, PEOPLES R CHINA, 2019.
Y. Shao, Y.C. Hu, V.M. Zavala, Mitigating investment risk using modular technologies, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 153 (2021) 12.
C. Mayer, P. Breun, F. Schultmann, Considering risks in early stage investment planning for emission abatement technologies in large combustion plants, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142 (2017) 133-144.
M. Husein, I.Y. Chung, Ieee, Evaluating investment in grid-connected microgrid under policy and technology risks, in: 21st International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Ieee, Jeju, SOUTH KOREA, 2018, pp. 1986-1989.
A. Golub, O. Lugovoy, V. Potashnikov, Quantifying barriers to decarbonization of the Russian economy: real options analysis of investment risks in low-carbon technologies, Climate Policy, 19 (2019) 716-724.
H.L. Shang, D.X. Mao, The empirical research on index system for evaluating hi-tech financial risk, in: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Orient Acad Forum, Sydney, AUSTRALIA, 2007, pp. 430-435.
G. Yuan, Financial risk evaluation for high-tech enterprises in China - Based on the perspective of Grey System Theory, in: International Conference on Management and Service Science, MASS 2011, IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
M.H. Qiao, Y.J. Bian, J.Q. Li, Ieee, Investment risk evaluation of information technology projects China Communication Enterprises, in: IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA), Ieee, Ottawa, CANADA, 2014, pp. 234-237.
E. Garnier, R. Madlener, The Influence of Policy Regime Risks on Investments in Innovative Energy Technology, Energy Journal, 37 (2016) 145-160.
L. Xu, S.Y. Tang, Technology Innovation-Oriented Complex Product Systems R&D Investment and Financing Risk Management: An Integrated Review, in: 10th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM), Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte Ltd, Baku, AZERBAIJAN, 2016, pp. 1653-1663.
H.M. Deng, Enterprise merger of financial risk management and protection, in: 2013 International Conference on Vehicle and Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, VMEIT 2013, August 17, 2013 - August 18, 2013, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2013, pp. 4452-4455.
H. Jean-Baptiste, L. Tao, M. Qiu, K. Gai, Understanding Model Risk Management - Model Rationalization in Financial Industry, in: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing, CSCloud 2015, November 3, 2015 - November 5, 2015, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., New York, NY, United states, 2015, pp. 301-306.
H. Jean-Baptiste, L.X. Tao, M.K. Qiu, K.K. Gai, Understanding Model Risk Management - Model Rationalization in Financial Industry, in: 2nd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CS Cloud), Ieee, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 301-306.
X. Cheng, Research on financial risk' evaluation factors of science and technology-oriented small-and-medium-sized enterprises, Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 28 (2017) 2425-2429.
L. Yang, Y. Zhang, Research on financial risk monitoring index of high-tech enterprises-based on entropy-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, in: 3rd International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining, FSDM 2017, November 24, 2017 - November 27, 2017, IOS Press BV, Hualien, Taiwan, 2017, pp. 317-325.
L. Yang, Y.T. Zhang, Research on Financial Risk Monitoring Index of High-Tech Enterprises-Based on Entropy-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation, in: 3rd International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining (FSDM), Ios Press, Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Hualien, TAIWAN, 2017, pp. 317-325.
X.Y. Ge, Y. Jin, Q. Li, X.F. Yao, S.C. Liu, Research on a Dynamic Evaluation of Financial Risks of Intellectual Property Pledge Financing of High-Tech Enterprises, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021 (2021) 11.
Y. Guo, Intervention of mobile payment risk of financial ic card on consumer trust and consumer psychological mechanism, Psychiatria Danubina, 34 (2022) S270-S271.
M. Lai, Analysis of Financial Risk Early Warning Systems of High-Tech Enterprises under Big Data Framework, Scientific Programming, 2022 (2022).
J.L. Liu, K. Chen, Enterprise Financial Risk Prevention and Control and Data Analysis Method Based on Blockchain Technology, Mobile Information Systems, 2022 (2022) 7.
X.M. Liu, Z. Nie, B.C. Li, Financial Mismatch and Default Risk:Evidence from Chinese Nonfinancial Listed Private Enterprises, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58 (2022) 852-862.
Y. Qi, N. Jain, Analysis of the financial risk early warning mechanism of high-tech enterprises under the data analysis technology, in: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Everything, AIE 2022, August 2, 2022 - August 4, 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Nicosia, Turkey, 2022, pp. 327-332.
L. Zuo, Analysis on financial risk early warning mechanism of high-tech enterprises under the background of big data, in: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Everything, AIE 2022, August 2, 2022 - August 4, 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Nicosia, Turkey, 2022, pp. 345-350.
S.Y. Qu, J.T. Wang, Y.H. Li, K.X. Wang, How does risk-taking affect the green technology innovation of high-tech enterprises in China: the moderating role of financial mismatch, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (2023) 23747-23763.
S. Faizi, W. Salabun, S. Ullah, T. Rashid, J. Wieckowski, A New Method to Support Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment Based on Normalized Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and COMET Technique, Symmetry-Basel, 12 (2020) 16.
B. Kizielewicz, J. Wieckowski, B. Paradowski, W. Salabun, Dealing with Nonmonotonic Criteria in Decision-Making Problems Using Fuzzy Normalization, in: 4th International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS), Springer International Publishing Ag, Bornova, TURKEY, 2022, pp. 27-35.
J. Wieckowski, B. Kizielewicz, W. Salabun, pyFDM: A Python library for uncertainty decision analysis methods, Softwarex, 20 (2022) 6.
J. Wieckowski, B. Kizielewicz, W. Salabun, Handling decision-making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment: PyIFDM package, Softwarex, 22 (2023) 8.
W. Salabun, J. Wieckowski, A. Shekhovtsov, K. Palczewski, S. Jaszczak, J. Watrobski, How to Apply Fuzzy MISO PID in the Industry? An Empirical Study Case on Simulation of Crane Relocating Containers, Electronics, 9 (2020) 15.
J. Wieckowski, L. Dobryakova, A fuzzy assessment model for freestyle swimmers - a comparative analysis of the MCDA methods, in: 25th KES International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (KES), Elsevier Science Bv, Szczecin, POLAND, 2021, pp. 4148-4157.
B. Kizielewicz, B. Paradowski, J. Wieckowski, W. Salabun, Towards the identification of MARCOS models based on intuitionistic fuzzy score functions, in: 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS), Ieee, Sofia, BULGARIA, 2022, pp. 789-798.
H. Sun, Z. Yang, Q. Cai, G.W. Wei, Z.W. Mo, An extended Exp-TODIM method for multiple attribute decision making based on the Z-Wasserstein distance, Expert Systems with Applications, 214 (2023) 14.
H.Y. Zhang, G.W. Wei, Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using the spherical fuzzy CPT-CoCoSo and D-CRITIC method, Computational & Applied Mathematics, 42 (2023) 35.
M.B. Maisuria, D.M. Sonar, M.K. Rathod, Nanofluid selection used for coolant in heat exchanger by multiple attribute decision-making method, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 35 (2021) 689-695.
A. Mousazadeh, M. Kafaee, M. Ashraf, Ranking of commercial photodiodes in radiation detection using multiple-attribute decision making approach, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section a-Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 987 (2021) 5.
M. Talafha, A. Alkouri, S. Alqaraleh, H. Zureigat, A. Aljarrah, Complex hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications in multiple attributes decision-making problems, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41 (2021) 7299-7327.
S.S. Appadoo, M. Makhan, A. Kumar, Commentary on "Utilizing Linguistic Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Problems'', International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23 (2021) 1914-1917.
S.S. Baral, K. Mohanasundaram, S. Ganesan, Selection of suitable adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) by using objective based multiple attribute decision making method, Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology, 51 (2021) 69-75.
S.M. Chen, W.T. Liao, Multiple attribute decision making using Beta distribution of intervals, expected values of intervals, and new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values, Information Sciences, 579 (2021) 863-887.
H. Garg, Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, Interval-Valued Picture Uncertain Linguistic Generalized Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46 (2021) 10153-10170.
C. Jana, G. Muhiuddin, M. Pal, Multiple-attribute decision making problems based on SVTNH methods, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11 (2020) 3717-3733.
M. Qiyas, S. Abdullah, S. Ashraf, M. Aslam, Utilizing Linguistic Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Problems, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22 (2020) 310-320.
N. Zarbakhshnia, Y. Wu, K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making approach for outsourcing sustainable reverse logistics, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242 (2020) 16.
M. Al-Gharabally, A.F. Almutairi, A.A. Salman, Particle swarm optimization application for multiple attribute decision making in vertical handover in heterogenous wireless networks, Journal of Engineering Research, 9 (2021) 12.
I. Alshammari, P. Mani, C. Ozel, H. Garg, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Algorithm via Picture Fuzzy Nano Topological Spaces, Symmetry-Basel, 13 (2021) 12.
M. Gong, Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method for multimedia teaching effectiveness comprehensive evaluation in college english with double-valued neutrosophic numbers, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Preprint (2023) https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-233116.
Y. Li, Study on fuzzy comprehensive competitiveness evaluation of urban exhibition industry with hesitant fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45 (2023) 1313-1323.
J. Wang, Extended TODIM method based on VIKOR for quality evaluation of higher education scientific research management under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Preprint (2023) https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-232621.
K.T. Atanassov, More on intuitionistic fuzzy-sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 33 (1989) 37-45.
E. Szmidt, J. Kacprzyk, Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making, Control and Cybernetics, 31 (2002) 1037-1053.
K. Atanassov, G. Pasi, R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making, International Journal of Systems Science, 36 (2005) 859-868.
E. Szmidt, J. Kacprzyk, A new concept of a similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making, in: V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, S. Miyamoto (Eds.) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings, 2005, pp. 272-282.
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems., Management Decision, 57 (2018) 2501-2519.
K.T. Atanassov, Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 64 (1994) 159-174.
S.-M. Chen, J.-M. Tan, Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67 (1994) 163-172.
D.H. Hong, C.-H. Choi, Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114 (2000) 103-113.
Z.S. Xu, R.R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems, 35 (2006) 417-433.
Q. Jiang, X. Jin, S.J. Lee, S.W. Yao, A new similarity/distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the transformed isosceles triangles and its applications to pattern recognition, Expert Systems with Applications, 116 (2019) 439-453.
Z.X. Su, G.P. Xia, M.Y. Chen, Some induced intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators applied to multi-attribute group decision making, International Journal of General Systems, 40 (2011) 805-835.
Z.S. Xu, J. Chen, On geometric aggregation ove interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, in: 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Ieee Computer Soc, Haikou, PEOPLES R CHINA, 2007, pp. 466-+.
C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (1948) 379-423.
X. Huang, J. Peng, Construction of an evaluation index system for the effectiveness of supervision of rural small and medium-sized financial institutions, Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 35 (2011) 49-52.
A.R. Mishra, A. Mardani, P. Rani, E.K. Zavadskas, A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures, Journal of Cleaner Production, 272 (2020).
Z.S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, Ieee Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15 (2007) 1179-1187.
W. Zhou, J.M. He, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Normalized Weighted Bonferroni Mean and Its Application in Multicriteria Decision Making, Journal of Applied Mathematics, (2012).
J. Bao, Algorithms for MAGDM with intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application for evaluating the green technological innovation ability of the enterprises, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40 (2021) 9687-9707.
T.T. He, G.W. Wei, J.P. Lu, C. Wei, R. Lin, Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic Taxonomy method for supplier selection in medical instrument industries, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (2019) 4875.
F. Feng, Z.S. Xu, H. Fujita, M.Q. Liang, Enhancing PROMETHEE method with intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35 (2020) 1071-1104.
S.H. Zolfani, O.F. Gorcun, H. Kucukonder, Evaluation of the Special Warehouse Handling Equipment (Turret Trucks) Using Integrated FUCOM and WASPAS Techniques Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Aggregation Operators, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, (2023) 35.
W. Salabun, K. Urbaniak, A New Coefficient of Rankings Similarity in Decision-Making Problems, in: 20th Annual International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS), Springer International Publishing Ag, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 2020, pp. 632-645.
W. Sałabun, J. Wątróbski, A. Shekhovtsov, Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods, Symmetry, 12 (2020) 1549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v48i5.5169
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.